Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version
Site Map

See information for:

The Verified Voting Foundation engages in educational activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(3). Please visit VerifiedVoting.org for info about 501(c)(4) lobbying activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  Take Action  »  Resources  »  Voting Accessibility  »  Ballot-Marking Devices


Advantages of Ballot-Marking Devices


Optical scan voting systems have huge advantages over e-voting systems in terms of security, reliability, and relative cost. Some have argued that the main disadvantage of optical scan systems has historically been in terms of accessibility for disabled voters.

A new generation of ballot marking devices now makes it practical for optical scan voting systems to be equally accessible as e-voting machines. Information about these ballot marking devices is listed below. For other information related to accessibility and election systems, see Voting Accessibility Resources: Improving Voting Systems for Disabled People.


Ballot Marking Best for Accessible and Verifiable Voting
August 3rd, 2005

ES&S AutoMARK Completes Independent Testing
Election Systems & Software
May 9th, 2005

New Voting Machines Would Help Disabled
by Barry HalvorsenVictoria (TX) Advocate
April 28th, 2005

Ballot Marking Devices and Certification
by Bob KibrickVerified Voting Foundation
April 21st, 2005

Voting Machine For Disabled Could Provide Audit Feature
by W. David GardnerTechWeb.com
September 22nd, 2004

Accessible Voting with Voter Verifiable Paper Records in DRE Voting Systems
AVANTE International Technology, Inc.

OPTICAL VOTE-TRAKKER: A `Mark-Sense` Absentee & Precinct Based Voting System that Minimizes Both Voter and System Errors
AVANTE International Technology
January 1st, 2004

Compact Vote-Trakker
Used in conjunction with Avante Vote-Trakker (ITA tested to 1990 FEC standards, NASED certification # N-1-12-22-12-001 issued 5/20/2004)

Populex Digital Paper Ballot System
Populex (ITA tested to 2002 FEC standards, NASED certification number N-2-15-22-22-001 issued 11/18/2004)

AutoMark Technical Systems

Announcements

NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
Ruling Issued in Rutgers–Newark Law School’s Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines
Holt Statement on NJ Court Decision on Paper Ballots
Internet Voting, Still in Beta
MD: State elections head says new voting system costly, not effective
Coalition Supports Improvements for Troop Voting; Rejects Risky Internet Ballot Proposals
WV: The Internet is not a secure-enough platform for overseas voters
Maryland needs secure, verifiable voting system
TN: Voters need confidence in electoral process
Election Technology Leaders Launch "The Power To MOVE"
Patrick OKs expanded benefits for veterans
Plaintiffs Comment on Court Order regarding TN Voter Confidence Act
Security expert: no way to secure Internet voting
E-voting system lets voters verify their ballots are counted
Justice Department Probing Diebold Sale
In Industry First, Voting Machine Company to Publish Source Code
TN: State Division Of Elections Hosts Meeting On Optical Scan Voting
Verified Voting Statement on the Acquisition of Premier Election Solutions
Common Cause Tennessee Takes Legal Action to Protect Voters
Advocates warn of voting-machine 'monopoly'

Get E-Mail Alerts




Important Links

  • Election Workers: Take our 2008 Election Worker Survey
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project


  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    Verified Voting Foundation, Inc., is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, Verified Voting Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to Verified Voting Foundation, Inc.


    Privacy    Site Map