Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version

See information for:

The Verified Voting Foundation engages in educational activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(3). Please visit VerifiedVoting.org for info about 501(c)(4) lobbying activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation. Also, check out our blog and twitter feed.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  Voting integrity groups call for ...


Voting integrity groups call for investigation of South Carolina voting systems in wake of unexpected primary results in Democratic US Senate race

Contact: Mary Boyle - (202) 736-5770
Susan Greenhalgh - (917) 796-8782

June 16th, 2010

In light of questions raised around results of the South Carolina Democratic Party primary race for US Senate, Common Cause and Voter Action request the South Carolina State Elections Commission take immediate steps to launch an investigation of the state’s voting systems, as well as preserve voting data for a thorough investigation.

The reported results last week of the South Carolina Democratic primary election for the US Senate have raised questions among voters and observers as to whether the state's electronic voting system malfunctioned or was intentionally hacked. Those who believe there may have been voting system malfunctions that led to unusual results point to the fact that disparities exist between the precinct-based count and the absentee ballot count, the latter of which involves the use of a paper ballot optical scan system.

As organizations dedicated to voting system integrity, Common Cause and Voter Action request that the South Carolina State Elections Commission immediately take the following actions:

-Move to preserve all of the data stored in the South Carolina Voting system until there can be a complete investigation to resolve any questions as to whether computer software glitches, hardware problems, or hacking may have impacted the outcome of last Tuesday’s election.

-Suspend the June 22 runoff between GOP gubernatorial candidates immediately and commence a forensic investigation of the voting systems.

Programming glitches and errors which lead to miscounts are unfortunately all too common. When there is a paper ballot which proves voter intent, a simple recount of the paper ballots can rule out a computer counting glitch or reveal that one may have caused a miscount in the final tally. However, when there is no paper ballot to establish the vote count definitively, ruling out a computer glitch or even more nefarious hacking is much more difficult. Despite the difficulty, a forensic investigation into the voting systems should commence and all evidence should be preserved.

Federal law requires that jurisdictions conducting a federal election preserve all voting records for 22 months after an election. The US Justice Department states that this requirement includes the preservation of all physical ballots. In states using electronic voting machines, jurisdictions must preserve the data collected inside the machines.. Therefore the State Election Commission must impound the machines and secure without disruption the following critical components and data:

-The flash memory card from each voting machine which must include all ballot definition files, cast vote records, audit logs and event logs.

-The data in the Election Management System database and all database backups.

South Carolina is scheduled to conduct a statewide run-off election on June 22, using these same machines. Preparation for the run-off election will require election administrators to erase and re-program data crucial to an investigation of the primary, permanently eliminating the option of a forensic study.
Voters in South Carolina, as elsewhere, have a fundamental right to have their votes be properly counted and to have faith in the results of their elections. The promise of democracy demands no less.

###

Voter Action is a national non-profit organization that seeks to ensure election integrity in the United States through legal advocacy, research, and public education.

Common Cause is a nonpartisan, nonprofit advocacy organization founded in 1970 by John Gardner as a vehicle for citizens to make their voices heard in the political process and to hold their elected leaders accountable to the public interest.

Announcements

August 26, 2010
On India’s Electronic Voting Controversy
August 25, 2010
Pac-Man for president: Hack highlights e-voting flaws
August 6, 2010
Voting Technology Research Gets In-Depth
July 27, 2010
State Election Officials: Recountable Process A Must for Overseas Voters
July 20, 2010
Online Voting: All That Glitters Is Not Gold (Unless You're a Vendor)
June 21, 2010
Voting Without A Net In South Carolina
June 17, 2010
Voting results in New Jersey should not be mysterious
June 16, 2010
Verified Voting Calls for Recountable, Auditable Voting Systems Following South Carolina Primary
June 16, 2010
Voting integrity groups call for investigation of South Carolina voting systems in wake of unexpected primary results in Democratic US Senate race
June 15, 2010
On the South Carolina Primary
May 23, 2010
Benefits, risks of e-mail ballots weighed
May 4, 2010
PA - Team 4: Security Concerns About Voting Machines Remain
April 26, 2010
California Assembly committee endorses UC Berkeley statistician's election auditing method
March 8, 2010
Feds Move to Break Voting-Machine Monopoly
March 2, 2010
Is the Internet the Right Place for Our Ballots? Election Administration and Voting Rights Thought Leaders Weigh in on the Future of Overseas Voting at Summit 2010
February 25, 2010
Minnesota Civic Groups Refute Recount Claims
February 17, 2010
Groups and Election Officials Warn Department of Justice that Voting Machine Vendor Merger will Inflate Costs to Taxpayers, Threaten Election Accuracy and National Security
February 11, 2010
Fla. justices uphold local election law
February 3, 2010
NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Ruling Issued in Rutgers–Newark Law School’s Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines

Get E-Mail Alerts




Important Links

  • VVBlog: Check out the latest news and commentary at our blog.
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project


  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    Verified Voting Foundation, Inc., is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, Verified Voting Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to Verified Voting Foundation, Inc.


    Privacy    Site Map