Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version

See information for:

The Verified Voting Foundation engages in educational activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(3). Please visit VerifiedVoting.org for info about 501(c)(4) lobbying activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation. Also, check out our blog and twitter feed.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  PA - Team 4: Security Concerns ...


PA - Team 4: Security Concerns About Voting Machines Remain

Jim Parsons Talks With VoteAllegheny & County Elections Head

The Pittsburgh Channel
May 4th, 2010

When you go to the polls for the May 18 primary, can you be sure your vote will count?

Team 4 has been reporting on potential security flaws in Allegheny County for years, and it turns out that the same questionable machines and security procedures are being used today.

Team 4 investigator Jim Parsons reported that critics of the iVotronic voting machine say that, like any computer, the software can be changed to make it do something it wasn't designed to do -- such as count your vote twice or not at all.

At some undisclosed time next week, county elections workers will make a final software check on electronic voting machines before shipping them out to thousands of polling places. That's what worries the watchdog group VoteAllegheny.

"Whenever you have a system where only two minutes of access can provide a switch in the voting software, it's a very tough problem," said VoteAllegheny's Richard King.
At the North Side warehouse where thousands of electronic voting machines are kept for Allegheny County, Team 4 saw a side door propped open. Anyone could wander in.
"Once the software is verified, we need a document showing the touchscreen voting machines have not been tampered with in the warehouse," King said.

VoteAllegheny is in discussion with county officials to have security cameras mounted above the machines in the warehouse. Currently, cameras are only watching some of the doors.

But critics of iVotronic machines say the real solution is to scrap them -- as Ohio and California have done -- in favor of a machine which provides paper proof that the computer has counted your vote.

"In the event of possible fraud or machine malfunction, you need a physical backup," said VoteAllegheny's David Brown.

County officials say that random testing of the voting machine software provides adequate security.

"We have all these tests in place. We test before and after, and we haven't seen anything that shows that anything has been tampered with," said Mark Wolosik, manager of the county's Elections Division.

At polling places, poll workers are required to post a "zero count" printout from each electronic voting machine that shows the vote count was zero at the start of the day. If you don't see that posted, you can ask why.

If a voting machine is malfunctioning when you try to vote, you can demand to cast a provisional paper ballot. That is your right as a voter.

Also, voters should make sure that the judge of elections marks their presence on the numbered list of voters when they sign in at their polling places.

Announcements

August 26, 2010
On India’s Electronic Voting Controversy
August 25, 2010
Pac-Man for president: Hack highlights e-voting flaws
August 6, 2010
Voting Technology Research Gets In-Depth
July 27, 2010
State Election Officials: Recountable Process A Must for Overseas Voters
July 20, 2010
Online Voting: All That Glitters Is Not Gold (Unless You're a Vendor)
June 21, 2010
Voting Without A Net In South Carolina
June 17, 2010
Voting results in New Jersey should not be mysterious
June 16, 2010
Verified Voting Calls for Recountable, Auditable Voting Systems Following South Carolina Primary
June 16, 2010
Voting integrity groups call for investigation of South Carolina voting systems in wake of unexpected primary results in Democratic US Senate race
June 15, 2010
On the South Carolina Primary
May 23, 2010
Benefits, risks of e-mail ballots weighed
May 4, 2010
PA - Team 4: Security Concerns About Voting Machines Remain
April 26, 2010
California Assembly committee endorses UC Berkeley statistician's election auditing method
March 8, 2010
Feds Move to Break Voting-Machine Monopoly
March 2, 2010
Is the Internet the Right Place for Our Ballots? Election Administration and Voting Rights Thought Leaders Weigh in on the Future of Overseas Voting at Summit 2010
February 25, 2010
Minnesota Civic Groups Refute Recount Claims
February 17, 2010
Groups and Election Officials Warn Department of Justice that Voting Machine Vendor Merger will Inflate Costs to Taxpayers, Threaten Election Accuracy and National Security
February 11, 2010
Fla. justices uphold local election law
February 3, 2010
NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Ruling Issued in Rutgers–Newark Law School’s Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines

Get E-Mail Alerts




Important Links

  • VVBlog: Check out the latest news and commentary at our blog.
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project


  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    Verified Voting Foundation, Inc., is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, Verified Voting Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to Verified Voting Foundation, Inc.


    Privacy    Site Map