Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version

See information for:

The Verified Voting Foundation engages in educational activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(3). Please visit VerifiedVoting.org for info about 501(c)(4) lobbying activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation. Also, check out our blog and twitter feed.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  Coalition Supports Improvements ...


Coalition Supports Improvements for Troop Voting; Rejects Risky Internet Ballot Proposals

Contact: Holly Jacobson, Executive Director, Voter Action, (206) 723-1941 - Pam Smith, President, Verified Voting, (760) 613-0172

January 26th, 2010

OLYMPIA: Voting rights groups Voter Action, Common Cause, FUSE Washington and Verified Voting joined security experts today to support Washington’s desire to improve voting opportunities for military and overseas voters. However, all warned that the proposed voting technologies for returning voted ballots via online electronic transmission are fundamentally insecure and do not fully respect the rights of voters deployed overseas to a private and secure ballot.

“It’s critical that we ensure our brave men and women serving overseas have adequate time to vote in a trustworthy manner,” said Holly Jacobson, Executive Director of Voter Action, a national election integrity organization based in Seattle. “In spite of good intentions, pending WA State legislation will NOT provide a trustworthy mechanism for these voters, as the recent internet based attacks of the Google corporate infrastructure and other major corporations dramatically illustrates. Indeed, it is no less than a matter of national security.”

Pending bills HB 2483 and its companion SB 6238, allowing for a ballot to be returned by inherently insecure email and fax, and HB 1624 and its companion SB 5522, permitting internet voting without providing adequate security and privacy, are being pursued seemingly to meet the requirements of the 2009 federal Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment Act (MOVE). The Act requires the provision of voter registration applications, absentee ballot applications and transmittal of blank absentee ballots by mail and electronically. However, MOVE specifically avoids calling for the electronic return of voted ballots. According to the GAO: “...[Internet and email voting are]more vulnerable to privacy and security compromises than conventional methods now in use...[and]...available safeguards may not adequately reduce the risks of compromise."

“There’s a clear distinction between using electronic means for outgoing ballots and information, which we strongly support, and using it to receive incoming voted ballots,” said Pamela Smith, President of Verified Voting, a national organization researching election reliability issues. “Because secrecy and security simply cannot be assured, transmitting voted ballots electronically would dishonor the very men and women serving to protect us. Fortunately, there are better alternatives.”

Dr. Barbara Simons, a computer scientist and member of the Board of Advisors of the U.S. Elections Assistance Commission, expressed concern about the proposed legislation. "We must ensure that we have established strong cybersecurity criteria before we experiment with transmitting voted ballots through cyberspace. The reality is that any system using current technology that allows voted ballots to be returned over the internet, including via email, can be hacked by other countries, as well as by criminals and political operatives."

To date, Washington State has one of the strongest voting systems in the country for military and overseas voters with 76% participation and over 99% of the ballots successfully counted. We encourage legislators to continue moving this legacy forward by increasing accessibility, while maintaining security.

Military and overseas voters should be offered the same reverence and assurances as those who are voting within the country. We urge legislators to modify HB 2483 and SB 6238 to pass those provisions expediting the sending of blank ballots and reject the provisions allowing for electronically transmitted voted ballots. We further urge lawmakers to reject HB 1624 and SB 5522.

Announcements

August 26, 2010
On India’s Electronic Voting Controversy
August 25, 2010
Pac-Man for president: Hack highlights e-voting flaws
August 6, 2010
Voting Technology Research Gets In-Depth
July 27, 2010
State Election Officials: Recountable Process A Must for Overseas Voters
July 20, 2010
Online Voting: All That Glitters Is Not Gold (Unless You're a Vendor)
June 21, 2010
Voting Without A Net In South Carolina
June 17, 2010
Voting results in New Jersey should not be mysterious
June 16, 2010
Verified Voting Calls for Recountable, Auditable Voting Systems Following South Carolina Primary
June 16, 2010
Voting integrity groups call for investigation of South Carolina voting systems in wake of unexpected primary results in Democratic US Senate race
June 15, 2010
On the South Carolina Primary
May 23, 2010
Benefits, risks of e-mail ballots weighed
May 4, 2010
PA - Team 4: Security Concerns About Voting Machines Remain
April 26, 2010
California Assembly committee endorses UC Berkeley statistician's election auditing method
March 8, 2010
Feds Move to Break Voting-Machine Monopoly
March 2, 2010
Is the Internet the Right Place for Our Ballots? Election Administration and Voting Rights Thought Leaders Weigh in on the Future of Overseas Voting at Summit 2010
February 25, 2010
Minnesota Civic Groups Refute Recount Claims
February 17, 2010
Groups and Election Officials Warn Department of Justice that Voting Machine Vendor Merger will Inflate Costs to Taxpayers, Threaten Election Accuracy and National Security
February 11, 2010
Fla. justices uphold local election law
February 3, 2010
NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Ruling Issued in Rutgers–Newark Law School’s Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines

Get E-Mail Alerts




Important Links

  • VVBlog: Check out the latest news and commentary at our blog.
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project


  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    Verified Voting Foundation, Inc., is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, Verified Voting Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to Verified Voting Foundation, Inc.


    Privacy    Site Map