Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version

See information for:

The Verified Voting Foundation engages in educational activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(3). Please visit VerifiedVoting.org for info about 501(c)(4) lobbying activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation. Also, check out our blog and twitter feed.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  November 2009 Snapshot: Maine, ...


November 2009 Snapshot:
Maine, New Jersey, New York (NY-23), and Virginia

November 3rd, 2009

Maine
All votes in Maine are cast on paper ballots marked by the voter, but there is no post-election manual tally audit. Of the state's approximately 950,000 registered voters, over 520,000 live in jurisdictions where optical scan equipment tallies the votes. The remainder live in jurisdictions where ballots are hand-counted on election night.

New Jersey
More than four years after the New Jersey Legislature enacted a law to require verifiable ballots for every vote cast, the vast majority of votes in today's gubernatorial election will be purely electronic.

In 18 of New Jersey's 21 counties, with approximately 95% of the state's registered voters, the Sequoia AVC Advantage push-button electronic voting machine is used for all but absentee voting. The AVC Advantage has - rightly - been subject of controversy. In February 2008, Advantage machines reported discrepant numbers in the Presidential primary. A court-ordered review has found numerous, unacceptable vulnerabilities. In August 2009, researchers and found that a revolutionary new attack on the Advantage is possible without injecting code into the system.

Salem County, with over 45,000 voters, uses the Sequoia Edge touch screen voting machine. Sussex County, with over 95,000 voters, uses the ES&S iVotronic for polling-place voting, and Warren County uses the Avante Vote Trakker.

No state has experienced a more tortured journey to verifiable elections than New Jersey. Since the Legislature passed a law to require voter-verifiable paper records in 2005, the deadline for implementation has been delayed three times, first to July 2008, then to January 2009, then to such time as state and federal funds are available. One of the major reasons for delay has been the one-of-a-kind printers that the state ordered for its Sequoia AVC Advantage voting machines. The printers have experienced reliability problems in testing, and are regarded widely as a "Rube Goldberg" solution.

New York (NY-23)
8 of the 11 counties in the 23rd Congressional District, will participate countywide in the State Board of Election's optical scan pilot program. These 8 counties comprise over 300,000 of the 23rd District's nearly 400,000 voters. Oswego County is participating partially in the voting system pilot. Clinton and Essex counties are not participating.

Optically scanned paper ballots will be audited according to New York's existing manual tally audit law, in which 3% of scanners will be selected, and the ballots initially tallied by the scanners will be counted by hand.

Virginia
As in New Jersey, most votes in Virginia's gubernatorial election will be cast on unverifiable DREs. Virginia's election jurisdictions consist of the Commonwealth's 95 counties plus 39 cities. About 60% of the Commonwealth's voters live in jurisdictions where only DREs are used for polling-place voting, and over 33% live where a combination of DREs and voter-marked paper ballots are used. No DREs in Virginia are equipped with a voter-verifiable paper audit trail printer.

Virginia's Legislature has banned the future purchase of direct-recording electronic voting machines (DREs). DREs now in use may be used for the remainder of their "useful life."

Fairfax County, the Commonwealth's largest, began using both optically scanned paper ballots and DREs in the 2008 general election. In all, 27 jurisdictions use both paper ballots and DRE. 5 Virginia jurisdictions use only paper ballots at the polls.

A breakdown of the jurisdictions using DREs for all but absentee voting:


  • 28 cities and counties, with nearly 700,000 voters, use the AVS WinVote.
  • 9 jurisdictions, with approximately 215,000 voters, use the ES&S iVotronic touch screen.
  • 3 cities, with over 135,000 voters, use the Hart Intercivic eSlate.
  • 4 cities, including Virginia Beach City, with a combined total of approximately 570,000 voters, use the Premier TSx touch screen.
  • 9 jurisdictions, with over 200,000 voters, use the Sequoia AVC Advantage.
  • 26 jurisdictions, with approximately 575,000 registered voters, use the Sequoia Edge touch screen DRE.
  • 23 jurisdictions, with over 370,000 voters, use the Unilect Patriot DRE.
Announcements

August 26, 2010
On India’s Electronic Voting Controversy
August 25, 2010
Pac-Man for president: Hack highlights e-voting flaws
August 6, 2010
Voting Technology Research Gets In-Depth
July 27, 2010
State Election Officials: Recountable Process A Must for Overseas Voters
July 20, 2010
Online Voting: All That Glitters Is Not Gold (Unless You're a Vendor)
June 21, 2010
Voting Without A Net In South Carolina
June 17, 2010
Voting results in New Jersey should not be mysterious
June 16, 2010
Verified Voting Calls for Recountable, Auditable Voting Systems Following South Carolina Primary
June 16, 2010
Voting integrity groups call for investigation of South Carolina voting systems in wake of unexpected primary results in Democratic US Senate race
June 15, 2010
On the South Carolina Primary
May 23, 2010
Benefits, risks of e-mail ballots weighed
May 4, 2010
PA - Team 4: Security Concerns About Voting Machines Remain
April 26, 2010
California Assembly committee endorses UC Berkeley statistician's election auditing method
March 8, 2010
Feds Move to Break Voting-Machine Monopoly
March 2, 2010
Is the Internet the Right Place for Our Ballots? Election Administration and Voting Rights Thought Leaders Weigh in on the Future of Overseas Voting at Summit 2010
February 25, 2010
Minnesota Civic Groups Refute Recount Claims
February 17, 2010
Groups and Election Officials Warn Department of Justice that Voting Machine Vendor Merger will Inflate Costs to Taxpayers, Threaten Election Accuracy and National Security
February 11, 2010
Fla. justices uphold local election law
February 3, 2010
NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Ruling Issued in Rutgers–Newark Law School’s Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines

Get E-Mail Alerts




Important Links

  • VVBlog: Check out the latest news and commentary at our blog.
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project


  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    Verified Voting Foundation, Inc., is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, Verified Voting Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to Verified Voting Foundation, Inc.


    Privacy    Site Map