Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version

See information for:

The Verified Voting Foundation engages in educational activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(3). Please visit VerifiedVoting.org for info about 501(c)(4) lobbying activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation. Also, check out our blog and twitter feed.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  TN: State Division Of Elections ...


TN: State Division Of Elections Hosts Meeting On Optical Scan Voting

The Chattanoogan
October 9th, 2009

A group of election officials from across Tennessee held detailed discussions this week about how to properly conduct elections using paper ballots, state officials said.

Representatives from Hamilton County explained their procedures for using optical scan voting equipment during a two-day meeting of the state Division of Elections’ paper ballot rules committee in Nashville.

Committee members also had detailed discussions about the proper chain of custody for ballots before, during and after elections.

The Division of Elections appointed the committee last month to make recommendations about comprehensive rules that will govern the use of paper ballots in elections statewide.

Hamilton is one of only two Tennessee counties currently using optical scan voting equipment in elections.

However, the Tennessee Voter Confidence Act requires all 95 counties in the state to use paper ballots and optical scan voting equipment by the November 2010 elections.

“Coming into compliance with this act does create a number of challenges, including establishing comprehensive rules for the use of paper ballots,” Coordinator of Elections Mark Goins said. “The Division of Elections is preparing county election officials for this transition.”

The Division of Elections sent out e-mails to county election officials throughout the state, inviting them to apply to serve on the committee. Those interested in serving were given until Sept. 10 to respond. Mr. Goins and Joe Enoch of the Tennessee Association of County Election Officials then selected the committee members from that pool of applicants.

Committee members include: Charles Holiway, representing Roane County; Donna Yates, representing Warren County; Scott Allen and Steve Gaston, representing Hamilton County; Kris Williams, representing McMinn County; Jane Heathcott, representing Dyer County; Linda Burnett, representing Tipton County; Sheila Allen, representing Lincoln County; Kim Buckley, representing Madison County; Vickie Koelman, representing Montgomery County; Ray Barrett, representing Davidson County and Enoch.

Announcements

August 26, 2010
On India’s Electronic Voting Controversy
August 25, 2010
Pac-Man for president: Hack highlights e-voting flaws
August 6, 2010
Voting Technology Research Gets In-Depth
July 27, 2010
State Election Officials: Recountable Process A Must for Overseas Voters
July 20, 2010
Online Voting: All That Glitters Is Not Gold (Unless You're a Vendor)
June 21, 2010
Voting Without A Net In South Carolina
June 17, 2010
Voting results in New Jersey should not be mysterious
June 16, 2010
Verified Voting Calls for Recountable, Auditable Voting Systems Following South Carolina Primary
June 16, 2010
Voting integrity groups call for investigation of South Carolina voting systems in wake of unexpected primary results in Democratic US Senate race
June 15, 2010
On the South Carolina Primary
May 23, 2010
Benefits, risks of e-mail ballots weighed
May 4, 2010
PA - Team 4: Security Concerns About Voting Machines Remain
April 26, 2010
California Assembly committee endorses UC Berkeley statistician's election auditing method
March 8, 2010
Feds Move to Break Voting-Machine Monopoly
March 2, 2010
Is the Internet the Right Place for Our Ballots? Election Administration and Voting Rights Thought Leaders Weigh in on the Future of Overseas Voting at Summit 2010
February 25, 2010
Minnesota Civic Groups Refute Recount Claims
February 17, 2010
Groups and Election Officials Warn Department of Justice that Voting Machine Vendor Merger will Inflate Costs to Taxpayers, Threaten Election Accuracy and National Security
February 11, 2010
Fla. justices uphold local election law
February 3, 2010
NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Ruling Issued in Rutgers–Newark Law School’s Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines

Get E-Mail Alerts




Important Links

  • VVBlog: Check out the latest news and commentary at our blog.
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project


  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    Verified Voting Foundation, Inc., is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, Verified Voting Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to Verified Voting Foundation, Inc.


    Privacy    Site Map