Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version

See information for:

The Verified Voting Foundation engages in educational activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(3). Please visit VerifiedVoting.org for info about 501(c)(4) lobbying activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation. Also, check out our blog and twitter feed.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  News  »  Breaking News  »  National: Text of H.R. 811 as ...


National: Text of H.R. 811 as amended by the Committee on House Administration

by Robert Kibrick, Legislative Analyst
May 11th, 2007

On May 8, the Committee on House Administration (chaired by Rep. Robert Brady of Pennsylvania), during its consideration and mark-up session on H.R. 811, adopted a substitute amendment by Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California, who chairs the Comittee's Elections subcommittee. That amendment completely replaces the text of H.R. 811, as originally introduced by Rep. Rush Holt of New Jersey in February 2007.

While much of the language of the Lofgren substitute is identical to that of the original H.R. 811, some of the substitute's provisions differ in a number of significant ways. Those differences are intended to address various concerns raised during hearings held by the Committee's Elections subcommittee earlier this year.

In addition, during the May 8 mark-up session, the Committee considered several other amendments, some to amend the original text of H.R. 811 and others to amend the Lofgren substitute. Most of those other amendments were not approved by the Committee. However, two amendments to the Lofgren substitute were approved:

1. An amendment, offered by Rep. Charles Gonzalez of Texas, providing two technical corrections.

2. An amendment, offered by Rep. Michael Capuano of Massachusetts, enabling voters in elections for Federal office to request and receive a paper ballot.

As a result, the current text of H.R. 811, as approved by the Committee and referred to the full House, is reflected by the Lofgren substitute as amended by the Gonzalez and Capuano amendments:

Text of Lofgren substitute

Text of Gonzalez amendment to the Lofgren substitute

Text of Capuano amendment to the Lofgren substitute

The full current text of H.R. 811, as approved by the Committee, has now been merged into a single document and can be found here.

An updated summary of the provisions of H.R. 811, as amended by the Committee, can be found here.

A copy of the Committee's full report (House Report 110-154) can be found here.

Announcements

August 26, 2010
On India’s Electronic Voting Controversy
August 25, 2010
Pac-Man for president: Hack highlights e-voting flaws
August 6, 2010
Voting Technology Research Gets In-Depth
July 27, 2010
State Election Officials: Recountable Process A Must for Overseas Voters
July 20, 2010
Online Voting: All That Glitters Is Not Gold (Unless You're a Vendor)
June 21, 2010
Voting Without A Net In South Carolina
June 17, 2010
Voting results in New Jersey should not be mysterious
June 16, 2010
Verified Voting Calls for Recountable, Auditable Voting Systems Following South Carolina Primary
June 16, 2010
Voting integrity groups call for investigation of South Carolina voting systems in wake of unexpected primary results in Democratic US Senate race
June 15, 2010
On the South Carolina Primary
May 23, 2010
Benefits, risks of e-mail ballots weighed
May 4, 2010
PA - Team 4: Security Concerns About Voting Machines Remain
April 26, 2010
California Assembly committee endorses UC Berkeley statistician's election auditing method
March 8, 2010
Feds Move to Break Voting-Machine Monopoly
March 2, 2010
Is the Internet the Right Place for Our Ballots? Election Administration and Voting Rights Thought Leaders Weigh in on the Future of Overseas Voting at Summit 2010
February 25, 2010
Minnesota Civic Groups Refute Recount Claims
February 17, 2010
Groups and Election Officials Warn Department of Justice that Voting Machine Vendor Merger will Inflate Costs to Taxpayers, Threaten Election Accuracy and National Security
February 11, 2010
Fla. justices uphold local election law
February 3, 2010
NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Ruling Issued in Rutgers–Newark Law School’s Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines

Get E-Mail Alerts




Important Links

  • VVBlog: Check out the latest news and commentary at our blog.
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project


  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    Verified Voting Foundation, Inc., is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, Verified Voting Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to Verified Voting Foundation, Inc.


    Privacy    Site Map