Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version

See information for:

The Verified Voting Foundation engages in educational activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(3). Please visit VerifiedVoting.org for info about 501(c)(4) lobbying activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation. Also, check out our blog and twitter feed.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  News  »  Breaking News  »  GA: Voting machine firm hires ...


GA: Voting machine firm hires ex-elections director

by Carlos Campos (ccampos@ajc.com)Atlanta Journnal-Constitution
December 23rd, 2006

The former head of elections for Georgia is going to work for the company that supplied the state's $75 million electronic voting machine system.

Kathy Rogers, director of the secretary of state's elections division, resigned Nov. 30 and has accepted a job with Diebold Election Systems, manufacturer of Georgia's voting machines, according to several state officials. Rogers apparently will serve as a liaison between elections officials throughout the United States and Diebold.

State Election Board member Tex McIver said Friday he is troubled by the move and will meet to discuss Rogers' plans to work for Diebold. Rogers, appointed in 2002 by Secretary of State Cathy Cox, a Democrat, sparred often with Republican members of the election board.

Incoming Secretary of State Karen Handel, elected in November to fill Cox's vacant seat, said she, too, is concerned about Rogers' employment with Diebold.

"When I am in office, I'll be able to address it directly with Diebold," Handel said Friday. "For me, as secretary of state, she will not be the liaison in Georgia. That's a nonstarter for me. I think it is a conflict of interest when you have someone who ran a department basically lobbying for that particular vendor without a cooling-off period."

Electronic voting has come under fire in recent years by computer scientists and political activists who claim the machines can easily be rigged to manipulate election results. Ohio-based Diebold, in particular, took heat when its CEO at the time, Walden O'Dell, wrote a fund-raising letter in which he pledged to "deliver" Ohio's electoral votes for President Bush in the 2004 election. O'Dell has since left Diebold.

Rogers has been a staunch defender of Diebold's equipment, vehemently denying claims that the machines can be easily hacked. In numerous interviews with the Journal-Constitution and testimony before public officials, Rogers has expressed confidence in Diebold and said the elections process in Georgia has numerous checks and balances to detect and prevent electronic voting fraud.

Rogers did not return a message left on her cellphone Friday. David Bear, a spokesman for Diebold, could not confirm any details Friday about Rogers' employment with the company. Cox, through a spokesman, declined comment.

Handel said she was told about Rogers' job with Diebold by the employee who has replaced Rogers as head of elections. Members of the State Election Board were told the same.

Rogers, former head of elections in Savannah's Chatham County, was not involved in selecting Diebold as the state's voting machine vendor, said Cox spokesman Chris Riggall.

Although some former state officials are prohibited from doing business with the state for a period upon leaving, it was not immediately clear Friday if Rogers would be subject to such a prohibition. A spokesman for the state attorney general's office could not be reached for comment.

Handel, who will be sworn in on Jan. 8, said she plans to enact a policy to prohibit former secretary of state employees from going to work for vendors for a specified period of time.

Handel declined to say whether she would have kept Rogers in the current job and does not blame her for seeking gainful employment. Rogers was earning $90,233 in her state job.

"I don't begrudge that of anybody, going out and seeking employment," Handel said.

But Handel, currently serving as chairman of the Fulton County Commission, added that her "own set of ethical standards" would have kept her from working for a county contractor after leaving office, given her "inside knowledge of how things work within the county."

Georgia activists who oppose electronic voting also raised questions about Rogers' move to Diebold.

"It is another indication of how tight vendors and lobbyists are with public officials," said Garland Favorito, founder of VoterGa, a nonpartisan group working for changes in elections. "I can't say there is a conflict of interest because she should be free to pursue the best career option. But her unwavering testimony at the Legislature in favor of Diebold and voting that cannot be verified, audited or recounted defied common sense to the point that it amazed nearly all of us."

Diebold has peripheral connections to Handel's new staff. Handel recently appointed Rob Simms as deputy secretary of state, the No. 2 post in the agency. Simms previously worked as a partner for Atlanta lobbyist Massey & Bowers. One of the firm's principals, former Secretary of State Lewis Massey, is the lobbyist for Diebold in Georgia.

Handel said Simms did not work on the Diebold account and added, "If anything, it's going to make for a higher hurdle for Diebold because clearly we're going to take extra steps to ensure that there's never any ability to raise questions about these relationships."

Simms said Friday he has never done any work for Diebold.

State Election Board Vice Chairman Tex McIver said Friday he wants the board to discuss Rogers' new job when it meets in January.

"I certainly believe this is a serious issue that the SEB needs to look into," McIver said.

Announcements

August 26, 2010
On India’s Electronic Voting Controversy
August 25, 2010
Pac-Man for president: Hack highlights e-voting flaws
August 6, 2010
Voting Technology Research Gets In-Depth
July 27, 2010
State Election Officials: Recountable Process A Must for Overseas Voters
July 20, 2010
Online Voting: All That Glitters Is Not Gold (Unless You're a Vendor)
June 21, 2010
Voting Without A Net In South Carolina
June 17, 2010
Voting results in New Jersey should not be mysterious
June 16, 2010
Verified Voting Calls for Recountable, Auditable Voting Systems Following South Carolina Primary
June 16, 2010
Voting integrity groups call for investigation of South Carolina voting systems in wake of unexpected primary results in Democratic US Senate race
June 15, 2010
On the South Carolina Primary
May 23, 2010
Benefits, risks of e-mail ballots weighed
May 4, 2010
PA - Team 4: Security Concerns About Voting Machines Remain
April 26, 2010
California Assembly committee endorses UC Berkeley statistician's election auditing method
March 8, 2010
Feds Move to Break Voting-Machine Monopoly
March 2, 2010
Is the Internet the Right Place for Our Ballots? Election Administration and Voting Rights Thought Leaders Weigh in on the Future of Overseas Voting at Summit 2010
February 25, 2010
Minnesota Civic Groups Refute Recount Claims
February 17, 2010
Groups and Election Officials Warn Department of Justice that Voting Machine Vendor Merger will Inflate Costs to Taxpayers, Threaten Election Accuracy and National Security
February 11, 2010
Fla. justices uphold local election law
February 3, 2010
NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Ruling Issued in Rutgers–Newark Law School’s Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines

Get E-Mail Alerts




Important Links

  • VVBlog: Check out the latest news and commentary at our blog.
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project


  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    Verified Voting Foundation, Inc., is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, Verified Voting Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to Verified Voting Foundation, Inc.


    Privacy    Site Map