Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version

See information for:

The Verified Voting Foundation engages in educational activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(3). Please visit VerifiedVoting.org for info about 501(c)(4) lobbying activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation. Also, check out our blog and twitter feed.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  Who can observe elections?


Who can observe elections?

by Pamela Smith, Nationwide Coordinator, Verified Voting Foundation
October 16th, 2006

WHO CAN OBSERVE – A partial list

How easy – or hard – is it to observe how elections work in your state or county? Wondering who may enter the polling place during the general election?

Here are some interesting facts:

  1. California makes no restrictions. Interested citizens may observe.

  1. Arizona, Delaware and Washington allow watchers who are selected by a political party.

  1. Arkansas, Florida, Georgia and Vermont allow watchers selected by a political party, and by candidates or groups of candidates.

  1. Colorado allows watchers selected by a political party and by candidates or groups of candidates. The watcher must take an oath. Colorado also allows party candidates and party officers to be in the polling place (while not voting).

  1. Hawaii allows watchers selected by a political party, only if the watcher is a registered voter of Hawaii. Candidates’ relatives are prohibited from being watchers. Source: http://www.hawaii.gov/elections/factsheets/fspo402.pdf

  1. Illinois allows watchers selected by a political party, by candidates, and watchers selected by other organizations (civic organizations, organized proponents and opponents of a specific ballot measure). Candidates and party officers may also watch (if they have credentials, as required for other watchers). Source: http://www.willclrk.com/images/pdffiles/Pollwatcher'sGuideforWebsite.pdf

  1. Iowa allows watchers selected by a political party and by candidates or groups of candidates, and watchers selected by other organizations. Iowa also allows children and adults engaged in educational programs.

  1. Kentucky allows watchers selected by a political party, only if the watcher is a registered voter not just of Kentucky, but also of the county where s/he observes. Kentucky also allows children and adults engaged in educational programs.

  1. Louisiana allows watchers selected by a candidate or group of candidates, but only if that watcher is a registered voter in Louisiana.

  1. Maine allows watchers selected by a political party and by candidates or groups of candidates, and watchers selected by other organizations. Maine also allows party officers to be in the polling place (while not voting), and all other persons not engaged in political activities.

  1. Michigan allows watchers selected by a political party or by other organization(s), but only if that watcher is a registered voter in Michigan.

  1. Minnesota allows watchers selected by a political party, but only if that watcher is a registered voter in Minnesota. Minnesota also allows children and adults engaged in educational programs, and representatives of the news media.

  1. Missouri allows watchers selected by a political party, only if the watcher is a registered voter not just of Missouri, but also of the county where s/he observes. Missouri also allows children and adults engaged in educational programs, representatives of the news media, and international election observers.

  1. Montana allows watchers selected by a political party or by a candidate or group of candidates. Montana also allows watchers selected by “any group having an interest in the election.” Source: http://data.opi.state.mt.us/bills/mca/13/13/13-13-121.htm

  1. Nevada allows watchers who are not engaged in political activities, but expressly prohibits representatives of the news media.

  1. New Hampshire allows watchers selected by a political party, and watchers selected by the state.

  1. New Jersey allows watchers selected by a political party and by candidates or groups of candidates, and also allows children and adults engaged in educational programs.

  1. New Mexico allows watchers selected by a political party and by candidates or a group of candidates, only if the watcher is a registered voter not just of New Mexico, but also of the county where s/he observes.

  1. North Carolina allows watchers selected by a political party and by candidates or a group of candidates, only if the watcher is a registered voter not just of North Carolina, but also of the county where s/he observes. North Carolina prohibits requiring observers to take any oath.

  1. Ohio allows watchers selected by a political party and by candidates or a group of candidates, only if the watcher is a registered voter in Ohio. The watcher must take an oath.

  1. Oregon allows watchers selected by a political party and by candidates or a group of candidates, and watchers selected by the state. Oregon also allows children and adults engaged in educational programs.

  1. Pennsylvania allows watchers selected by a political party and by candidates or a group of candidates, only if the watcher is a registered voter not just of Pennsylvania, but also of the county where s/he observes.

  1. Tennessee allows watchers selected by a political party and by candidates or a group of candidates, as well as representatives of the news media.

  1. Texas allows watchers selected by a political party and by candidates, as well as by proponents or opponents of a particular measure on the ballot and party officers, only if the watcher is a registered voter not just of Texas, but also of the county where s/he observes. Texas prohibits candidates who are not in the process of voting, as well as elected public officials, and anyone related to the election officials. Source: http://www.sos.state.tx.us/elections/pamphlets/pollwatcher.shtml

  1. Vermont (see #3 above). Note that challengers are permitted only outside guardrail six feet from voting booths and ballot boxes.

  1. Virginia allows watchers selected by a political party and by candidates or a group of candidates, only if the watcher is a registered voter not just of Virginia, but also of the county where s/he observes. Party candidates not in the process of voting are prohibited. Virginia also allows children and adults engaged in educational programs and representatives of the news media. Virginia’s code also allows local electoral boards to authorize “neutral observers.”

  1. Washington (see #2 above).

  1. West Virginia expressly prohibits all other persons not engaged in political activities.

  1. Wisconsin prohibits party candidates not in the process of voting; and allows all other persons not engaged in political activities.

Is your state missing from this list?

That’s part of the reason we put together the state and local versions of the Election Transparency Scorecard. We want to know more details about who can observe and by what rules, in all 50 states. You can help us: sign up today for the Transparency Project, and complete a scorecard for your state or county!

Much of the information in this document was sourced from a survey done by the election law center at Ohio State University – for details, see: http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/docs/polling-place.pdf
Additional sources are noted where applicable
.



Announcements

August 26, 2010
On India’s Electronic Voting Controversy
August 25, 2010
Pac-Man for president: Hack highlights e-voting flaws
August 6, 2010
Voting Technology Research Gets In-Depth
July 27, 2010
State Election Officials: Recountable Process A Must for Overseas Voters
July 20, 2010
Online Voting: All That Glitters Is Not Gold (Unless You're a Vendor)
June 21, 2010
Voting Without A Net In South Carolina
June 17, 2010
Voting results in New Jersey should not be mysterious
June 16, 2010
Verified Voting Calls for Recountable, Auditable Voting Systems Following South Carolina Primary
June 16, 2010
Voting integrity groups call for investigation of South Carolina voting systems in wake of unexpected primary results in Democratic US Senate race
June 15, 2010
On the South Carolina Primary
May 23, 2010
Benefits, risks of e-mail ballots weighed
May 4, 2010
PA - Team 4: Security Concerns About Voting Machines Remain
April 26, 2010
California Assembly committee endorses UC Berkeley statistician's election auditing method
March 8, 2010
Feds Move to Break Voting-Machine Monopoly
March 2, 2010
Is the Internet the Right Place for Our Ballots? Election Administration and Voting Rights Thought Leaders Weigh in on the Future of Overseas Voting at Summit 2010
February 25, 2010
Minnesota Civic Groups Refute Recount Claims
February 17, 2010
Groups and Election Officials Warn Department of Justice that Voting Machine Vendor Merger will Inflate Costs to Taxpayers, Threaten Election Accuracy and National Security
February 11, 2010
Fla. justices uphold local election law
February 3, 2010
NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Ruling Issued in Rutgers–Newark Law School’s Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines

Get E-Mail Alerts




Important Links

  • VVBlog: Check out the latest news and commentary at our blog.
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project


  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    Verified Voting Foundation, Inc., is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, Verified Voting Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to Verified Voting Foundation, Inc.


    Privacy    Site Map