Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version
Site Map

See information for:

The Verified Voting Foundation engages in educational activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(3). Please visit VerifiedVoting.org for info about 501(c)(4) lobbying activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  News  »  E-Voting News  »  Profs Examine Voting Accuracy


Profs Examine Voting Accuracy

Stanford and Peers Given $7.5 million to Investigate Electronic Voting Systems
by Mandy KovachStanford Daily
August 25th, 2005

The National Science Foundation, an independent federal agency devoted to researching and developing the sciences, recently granted $7.5 million to a group of five universities and one nonprofit research organization, enabling them to collectively study the reliability of electronic voting system.

The grant, announced on Aug. 15, will be used to fund a project called ACCURATE, or, A Center for Correct, Usable, Reliable, Auditable and Transparent Elections, said David Dill, professor of computer science and one of the participants in the project.

ACCURATE will be based at Johns Hopkins University, according to the Stanford News Service. Johns Hopkins University will receive $1.2 million over five years for the voting center, according to an Aug. 16 article in the Baltimore Sun. The remaining funds will go to the five other institutions.

The other participating universities are Stanford; UC Berkeley; the University of Iowa; and Rice University, and the nonprofit research organization involved in the effort is SRI International, based in Menlo Park.

Avi Rubin, professor of computer science at Johns Hopkins University and technical director at the University’s Information Security Institute, was chosen to head up the center.

The project focuses on making voting systems more reliable, Dill said. Dan Boneh, associate professor of computer science at Stanford, is also conducting research for ACCURATE.

“The research will target the fundamental barriers to making voting systems more trustworthy,” Dill told The Stanford Weekly. “Professor Boneh’s area of study is computer security and cryptography, while my area is formal verification — proving that systems do what they are supposed to do. These are both central to making systems trustworthy. Obviously, a system will not be trustworthy if someone has broken into it, or can read or fabricate data.”

Some of the experts conducting research for ACCURATE will study the psychological practicality of electronic voting systems by working with volunteers.

“The main application of psychology is usability,” Dill said. “A huge problem with voting technology has been voter errors and confusion. Many of the problems of Florida in the 2000 election, including the butterfly ballot, are usability problems. Those problems aren’t unique to Florida. They happen in every election with every type of equipment.”

The project has funds to last five years, which covers the 2008 presidential elections in the U.S. But participants in ACCURATE say their research may affect elections after 2008 more than the 2008 elections themselves.

“We might have some impact, but we’re conducting long-term research, and it takes quite a long time for new technology to make it into polling places,” Dill said.

Announcements

NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
Ruling Issued in RutgersNewark Law Schools Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines
Holt Statement on NJ Court Decision on Paper Ballots
Internet Voting, Still in Beta
MD: State elections head says new voting system costly, not effective
Coalition Supports Improvements for Troop Voting; Rejects Risky Internet Ballot Proposals
WV: The Internet is not a secure-enough platform for overseas voters
Maryland needs secure, verifiable voting system
TN: Voters need confidence in electoral process
Election Technology Leaders Launch "The Power To MOVE"
Patrick OKs expanded benefits for veterans
Plaintiffs Comment on Court Order regarding TN Voter Confidence Act
Security expert: no way to secure Internet voting
E-voting system lets voters verify their ballots are counted
Justice Department Probing Diebold Sale
In Industry First, Voting Machine Company to Publish Source Code
TN: State Division Of Elections Hosts Meeting On Optical Scan Voting
Verified Voting Statement on the Acquisition of Premier Election Solutions
Common Cause Tennessee Takes Legal Action to Protect Voters
Advocates warn of voting-machine 'monopoly'

Get E-Mail Alerts




Important Links

  • Election Workers: Take our 2008 Election Worker Survey
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project


  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    Verified Voting Foundation, Inc., is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, Verified Voting Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to Verified Voting Foundation, Inc.


    Privacy    Site Map