Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version

See information for:

The Verified Voting Foundation engages in educational activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(3). Please visit VerifiedVoting.org for info about 501(c)(4) lobbying activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation. Also, check out our blog and twitter feed.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  Press / Media  »  Media Releases  »  Advocates Urge Election Assistance ...


Advocates Urge Election Assistance Commission to Require Verification and Accessibility

Voters Can Have the Best of Both Worlds
July 28th, 2005

Verified Voting Foundation Media Release

For Immediate Release: Thursday, July 28, 2005

Contact:

David Dill
Founder and Board Director
Verified Voting Foundation
david@verifiedvoting.org

Shawn Casey O'Brien
Co-Host and Co-Producer
KPFK's Disability Awareness Show "Access Unlimited"
irishsob@verizon.net


Advocates Urge Election Assistance Commission to Require Verification and Accessibility

Voters Can Have the Best of Both Worlds

Pasadena, CA - Voting rights advocates in the disability community and supporters of a voter-verified paper ballot have come together today to urge the Election Assistance Commission to require voting systems that are both verifiable and accessible to all voters.

The advocates also joined together to remind California state election officials to uphold the goal of private, independent voting for all Californians -- including those with disabilities -- as the state implements its new "paper trail" law.

Former Executive Director of the Unique People's Voting Project, Shawn Casey O'Brien, called this meeting of the minds "a great break-through for all parties concerned."

"No one wants votes counted fully, fairly, and accurately, more than disabled citizens do," added O'Brien, who headed a voter registration effort that registered over 100,000 disabled voters. "California will feel the real political power of the disability vote now that we have proven that accessibility and the security of our voting systems are completely compatible."

"When I started in 2003, some people didn't understand how paper ballots could be accessible, so they pushed for paperless touchscreen machines to solve all of the voters' problems," said David Dill, a Stanford computer science professor and founder of the Verified Voting Foundation. "Now most people are realizing that there is no need for conflict between accessibility for voters with disabilities and the integrity of the voting system for everyone."

Dill and O'Brien both served on Secretary Shelley's Task Force on Touch-Screen Voting in 2003, which made recommendations that ultimately led former California
Secretary of State Kevin Shelley to require accessible voter-verified paper records (AVVPR) in the state. The state legislature later enacted a statute to require AVVPR.

Dill and O'Brien also called on current California Secretary of State Bruce McPherson to continue Shelley's strong emphasis on accessibility and privacy as the new law is implemented.

"We shouldn't look to technology as a solution that magically solves all accessibility problems," Prof. Dill stated. "All voting machines pose problems for some voters,
so we have some hard work ahead to establish guidelines that provide accessible and trustworthy machines."

"If the Secretary of State mandates that California spend its hundred million on voting equipment that is both accessible and verifiable, then voting technology manufacturers will come up with the technology to get their piece of that very expensive pie," O'Brien concluded.

After a year-long controversy, California was the first state to enact new election laws requiring an AVVPR for all voting equipment. The state brought together concerned citizens that were often at odds with each other on how to best protect against tampering with electronic voting machines, while promoting accessibility and ease of use for millions of disabled voters.

Today, 24 states have requirements for voter-verified paper records and, with the HAVA mandates, all polling places must soon offer accessible voting systems.

For this release:
http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/article.php?id=6209

Professor Dill's Election Assistance Commission testimony:
http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/article.php?id=6206

Disabled accessibility of current voting technology:
http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/access

ACB resolution on verifiable and accessible voting:
http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/acb

NAPAS statement protesting punitive lawsuits against AutoMARK ballot-marking device:
http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/napas

Verified Voting Foundation Response to AAPD Allegations:
http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/article.php?id=6019

Election Assistance Commission hearing announcement:
http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/article.php?id=6137

Prior testimony of Professor Dill to U.S. Senate Rules Committee:
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/article.php?id=5789

Prior testimony of Professor Dill to Carter-Baker Commission on Federal Election Reform:
http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/article.php?id=5987

Professor Dill's bio:
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/article.php?id=5617#dill

Map showing which states have VVPR requirements:
http://www.verifiedvoting.org

Latest details on verified voting legislation:
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/legis

E-voting malfunctions in the 2004 nationwide election:
http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/article.php?id=5302
and
http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/article.php?id=5331


PRESSLIST: Media professionals are invited to subscribe
to the Verified Voting presslist at
http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/presslist


About the Verified Voting Foundation:

The Verified Voting Foundation is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization championing reliable and publicly verifiable elections. Founded by Stanford University Computer Science Professor David Dill, the organization supports a requirement for voter-verified paper ballots for all voting technology, including electronic voting machines, to allow voters to inspect individual permanent records of their ballots and election officials to conduct meaningful recounts and audits. The organization's website is at
http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/

- end -
Announcements

August 26, 2010
On India’s Electronic Voting Controversy
August 25, 2010
Pac-Man for president: Hack highlights e-voting flaws
August 6, 2010
Voting Technology Research Gets In-Depth
July 27, 2010
State Election Officials: Recountable Process A Must for Overseas Voters
July 20, 2010
Online Voting: All That Glitters Is Not Gold (Unless You're a Vendor)
June 21, 2010
Voting Without A Net In South Carolina
June 17, 2010
Voting results in New Jersey should not be mysterious
June 16, 2010
Verified Voting Calls for Recountable, Auditable Voting Systems Following South Carolina Primary
June 16, 2010
Voting integrity groups call for investigation of South Carolina voting systems in wake of unexpected primary results in Democratic US Senate race
June 15, 2010
On the South Carolina Primary
May 23, 2010
Benefits, risks of e-mail ballots weighed
May 4, 2010
PA - Team 4: Security Concerns About Voting Machines Remain
April 26, 2010
California Assembly committee endorses UC Berkeley statistician's election auditing method
March 8, 2010
Feds Move to Break Voting-Machine Monopoly
March 2, 2010
Is the Internet the Right Place for Our Ballots? Election Administration and Voting Rights Thought Leaders Weigh in on the Future of Overseas Voting at Summit 2010
February 25, 2010
Minnesota Civic Groups Refute Recount Claims
February 17, 2010
Groups and Election Officials Warn Department of Justice that Voting Machine Vendor Merger will Inflate Costs to Taxpayers, Threaten Election Accuracy and National Security
February 11, 2010
Fla. justices uphold local election law
February 3, 2010
NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Ruling Issued in Rutgers–Newark Law School’s Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines

Get E-Mail Alerts




Important Links

  • VVBlog: Check out the latest news and commentary at our blog.
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project


  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    Verified Voting Foundation, Inc., is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, Verified Voting Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to Verified Voting Foundation, Inc.


    Privacy    Site Map