Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version
Site Map

See information for:

The Verified Voting Foundation engages in educational activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(3). Please visit VerifiedVoting.org for info about 501(c)(4) lobbying activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  News  »  E-Voting News  »  Justice Finds No Discrimination in ...


Justice Finds No Discrimination in Voting Machines Distribution

Ohio News Network
July 1st, 2005

COLUMBUS, Ohio -- The U.S. Department of Justice says it found no evidence of discrimination in the distribution of voting machines in two Ohio counties in the close 2004 presidential election.

The department, which is part of the Bush administration, began investigating after voters complained of long voting lines and alleged discrimination in Franklin and Knox counties. Investigators wanted to determine if elections officials had intentionally skewed the placement of machines.

The Justice Department said the distribution in Franklin County narrowly favored black voters. Because turnout in predominantly black precincts was lower than in white ones, machines in those districts averaged fewer votes, according to a report released Wednesday.


An unanticipated 76 percent turnout _ with many first-time voters _ contributed to the long lines in the Kenyon College precinct in Knox County, according to a report released in June. Some voters waited until 4 a.m. to cast their ballots.


President Bush won re-election Nov. 2 with his win in Ohio over Democrat John Kerry.

A Democratic National Committee report released last week found more complaints statewide among black voters about voting than white voters.

Walter Mebane, a Cornell University professor who worked on the DNC report, said voters in mainly black precincts in Franklin County who showed up early to vote found fewer machines than those who voted later, which could explain some of the differences between the two reports.

Distribution of voting machines is determined by county boards of elections, made up of two Democrats, two Republicans and two nonvoting members.


Franklin County had 2,904 machines on hand for 535,575 people who showed up to vote. The county intends to have at least 5,000 machines operating in 2008, said Michael Damschroder, elections board director.


When final registration numbers were available for the Kenyon College precinct, the Knox County board already had decided on the distribution of voting machines. Between March and November of 2004, the number of registered voters at the precinct more than doubled to 1,607. Two machines were available.


The county hopes to buy one new machine for every 175 voters, which based on current registration figures, would give the county about 200 new machines. The board will reserve six machines to dispatch on Election Day to crowded precincts, said Rita Yarman, board director.
Announcements

NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
Ruling Issued in Rutgers–Newark Law School’s Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines
Holt Statement on NJ Court Decision on Paper Ballots
Internet Voting, Still in Beta
MD: State elections head says new voting system costly, not effective
Coalition Supports Improvements for Troop Voting; Rejects Risky Internet Ballot Proposals
WV: The Internet is not a secure-enough platform for overseas voters
Maryland needs secure, verifiable voting system
TN: Voters need confidence in electoral process
Election Technology Leaders Launch "The Power To MOVE"
Patrick OKs expanded benefits for veterans
Plaintiffs Comment on Court Order regarding TN Voter Confidence Act
Security expert: no way to secure Internet voting
E-voting system lets voters verify their ballots are counted
Justice Department Probing Diebold Sale
In Industry First, Voting Machine Company to Publish Source Code
TN: State Division Of Elections Hosts Meeting On Optical Scan Voting
Verified Voting Statement on the Acquisition of Premier Election Solutions
Common Cause Tennessee Takes Legal Action to Protect Voters
Advocates warn of voting-machine 'monopoly'

Get E-Mail Alerts




Important Links

  • Election Workers: Take our 2008 Election Worker Survey
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project


  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    Verified Voting Foundation, Inc., is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, Verified Voting Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to Verified Voting Foundation, Inc.


    Privacy    Site Map