Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version

See information for:

The Verified Voting Foundation engages in educational activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(3). Please visit VerifiedVoting.org for info about 501(c)(4) lobbying activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation. Also, check out our blog and twitter feed.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  Voting Accessibility Resources: ...  »  Response to American Association ...


Response to American Association of People With Disabilities Allegations About Verified Voting Foundation

Verified Voting Foundation
June 20th, 2005

To: Mr. Andrew Imperato
President and Chief Executive Officer
American Association of People with Disabilities

cc: Jim Dickson, Angela Katsakis, Dr. Jonathan Young

 

Dear Mr. Imperato,

We ask that the following message be posted to the Justice for All mailing list no later than 1 P.M. EDT on Monday, June 20, to correct serious misinformation that was distributed over that mailing list by your organization last Thursday. Since the original post requested that constituents attend the Senate hearing Tuesday, this message should be sent rapidly so that those individuals have the correct information when attending the hearing.

Thank you,

Will Doherty
Executive Director
Verified Voting Foundation and VerifiedVoting.org


Subject: Correction to "Backlash against accessible voting" Message

On June 16, Angela Katsakis, Disability Vote Project Coordinator for the AAPD, posted a message entitled "Backlash against accessible voting" to the AAPD-affiliated Email listserv, "Justice for All" (the posting can be found at http://www.jfanow.org/jfanow/index.php?mode=A&id=2326;&sort=D ) (mirror). This message is intended to correct information posted inadvertently in that message.

The statement in the email that "Other organizations, like Verified Voting, are demanding that all accessible voting machines be banned and that voting be conducted only with paper" is incorrect. Neither the Verified Voting Foundation nor VerifiedVoting.org has ever made any such demand.

In fact, the organizations call for voting systems to be accessible and have worked to have accessibility language included in many state and federal bills. Their statement in support of accessible voting systems has been posted on their website for at least a year: http://www.verifiedvoting.org/article.asp?id=1875

The Verified Voting Foundation and VerifiedVoting.org are committed to working in support of verifiable AND ACCESSIBLE voting, and to working with disability organizations to ensure that all voters have access to a voting system that we all can trust. There is no need for conflict between verifiability and accessibility of voting systems.


For more information, see Voting Accessibility Resources: Improving Voting Systems for Disabled People.

Announcements

August 26, 2010
On India’s Electronic Voting Controversy
August 25, 2010
Pac-Man for president: Hack highlights e-voting flaws
August 6, 2010
Voting Technology Research Gets In-Depth
July 27, 2010
State Election Officials: Recountable Process A Must for Overseas Voters
July 20, 2010
Online Voting: All That Glitters Is Not Gold (Unless You're a Vendor)
June 21, 2010
Voting Without A Net In South Carolina
June 17, 2010
Voting results in New Jersey should not be mysterious
June 16, 2010
Verified Voting Calls for Recountable, Auditable Voting Systems Following South Carolina Primary
June 16, 2010
Voting integrity groups call for investigation of South Carolina voting systems in wake of unexpected primary results in Democratic US Senate race
June 15, 2010
On the South Carolina Primary
May 23, 2010
Benefits, risks of e-mail ballots weighed
May 4, 2010
PA - Team 4: Security Concerns About Voting Machines Remain
April 26, 2010
California Assembly committee endorses UC Berkeley statistician's election auditing method
March 8, 2010
Feds Move to Break Voting-Machine Monopoly
March 2, 2010
Is the Internet the Right Place for Our Ballots? Election Administration and Voting Rights Thought Leaders Weigh in on the Future of Overseas Voting at Summit 2010
February 25, 2010
Minnesota Civic Groups Refute Recount Claims
February 17, 2010
Groups and Election Officials Warn Department of Justice that Voting Machine Vendor Merger will Inflate Costs to Taxpayers, Threaten Election Accuracy and National Security
February 11, 2010
Fla. justices uphold local election law
February 3, 2010
NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Ruling Issued in Rutgers–Newark Law School’s Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines

Get E-Mail Alerts




Important Links

  • VVBlog: Check out the latest news and commentary at our blog.
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project


  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    Verified Voting Foundation, Inc., is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, Verified Voting Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to Verified Voting Foundation, Inc.


    Privacy    Site Map