Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version

See information for:

The Verified Voting Foundation engages in educational activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(3). Please visit VerifiedVoting.org for info about 501(c)(4) lobbying activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation. Also, check out our blog and twitter feed.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  Election 2004 E-Voting ...


Election 2004 E-Voting Incidents
from the Election Incident Reporting System

Verified Voting Foundation
November 18th, 2004

Election 2004 E-Voting Incidents
from the Election Incident Reporting System (EIRS)
 
Election Verification Project Press Conference
November 18, 2004
 
Summary:

  • Significant e-voting problems
  • Almost all vendors' products and models
  • Most jurisdictions where e-voting installed
  • Impacted at least tens or hundreds of thousands of voters
     
    Results:
  • Calls fielded by Election Protection Hotline: 175,213 (87,841 on E-Day)
  • Incident reports in EIRS: 34,000+ and counting (23,726+ on E-Day)
  • 'Machine Problem' incidents: 1,876+
  • E-Voting incidents: 895+
  • Preliminary findings from sample that's still growing, yet not statistically robust
     
    Notable Incidents / Clusters
  • Florida: Broward, Miami-Dade, and Palm Beach Counties
  • Louisiana: Orleans Parish
  • New Mexico: Bernalillo County
  • North Carolina: Carteret County
  • Ohio: Franklin and Mahoning Counties
  • Pennsylvania: Dauphin, Mercer, and Philadelphia Counties
     
    Next Steps
  • Further analysis and reporting of e-voting problems as well as other voting technologies
  • Discussions with election officials, voting technology vendors, and policymakers to improve elections process, technology, and regulation
     
    For more information:
  • EIRS incident database at:
    http://voteprotect.org/epc/ (click on "Research/Maps")
  • More about Verified Voting Foundation and Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility joint development of the EIRS:
    http://verifiedvoting.org/eirs/
  • Election Protection Coalition member organizations:
    http://www.electionprotection2004.org/coalition.htm
     
     

    Election 2004 E-Voting Incidents
    from the Election Incident Reporting System
     
    Election Verification Project Press Conference
    November 18, 2004
     
    E-Voting Problems Reported:

  • Machine breakdown
    (total malfunction, sometimes entire polling places, power/battery failures, machines locked, long lines, voters turned away)
  • Misrecording (Kerry recorded as Bush and vice-versa, touchscreen calibration)
  • Vote switched
  • Overcounts and undercounts
  • Wrong ballot or race/candidate/party slate missing or not working, no write-ins
  • Prefilled ballot choice
  • Straight ticket sticking
  • Unintended deselections
  • Forced votes to complete ballot
  • Indicates 'challenged ballot'
  • Not responding to human touch, just pencil eraser
  • Disabled accommodation disables other machines at polling place
  • Non-'accessible' voting machine, audio component not working
  • Premature casting
  • Overwritten votes (prior uncast)
  • Switched language (English to Spanish), or Spanish-only
  • Vote card times out, rejected, stuck, not reset, or cancels ballot
  • Claims vote cast after card removed
  • Blank screen / screen goes dark
  • Missing or poor distribution of machines
  • Audio offers only one candidate
  • No paper ballot alternative
  • Paper ballots treated as provisional
  • Told to use demo machine
  • Inadequate poll worker training
  • Not zeroed out at beginning of day
  • Security seals broken
  • Infrared port available
  • Cascading error in machine cluster
  • Announcements

    August 26, 2010
    On India’s Electronic Voting Controversy
    August 25, 2010
    Pac-Man for president: Hack highlights e-voting flaws
    August 6, 2010
    Voting Technology Research Gets In-Depth
    July 27, 2010
    State Election Officials: Recountable Process A Must for Overseas Voters
    July 20, 2010
    Online Voting: All That Glitters Is Not Gold (Unless You're a Vendor)
    June 21, 2010
    Voting Without A Net In South Carolina
    June 17, 2010
    Voting results in New Jersey should not be mysterious
    June 16, 2010
    Verified Voting Calls for Recountable, Auditable Voting Systems Following South Carolina Primary
    June 16, 2010
    Voting integrity groups call for investigation of South Carolina voting systems in wake of unexpected primary results in Democratic US Senate race
    June 15, 2010
    On the South Carolina Primary
    May 23, 2010
    Benefits, risks of e-mail ballots weighed
    May 4, 2010
    PA - Team 4: Security Concerns About Voting Machines Remain
    April 26, 2010
    California Assembly committee endorses UC Berkeley statistician's election auditing method
    March 8, 2010
    Feds Move to Break Voting-Machine Monopoly
    March 2, 2010
    Is the Internet the Right Place for Our Ballots? Election Administration and Voting Rights Thought Leaders Weigh in on the Future of Overseas Voting at Summit 2010
    February 25, 2010
    Minnesota Civic Groups Refute Recount Claims
    February 17, 2010
    Groups and Election Officials Warn Department of Justice that Voting Machine Vendor Merger will Inflate Costs to Taxpayers, Threaten Election Accuracy and National Security
    February 11, 2010
    Fla. justices uphold local election law
    February 3, 2010
    NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
    February 1, 2010
    Ruling Issued in Rutgers–Newark Law School’s Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines

    Get E-Mail Alerts




    Important Links

  • VVBlog: Check out the latest news and commentary at our blog.
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project


  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    Verified Voting Foundation, Inc., is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, Verified Voting Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to Verified Voting Foundation, Inc.


    Privacy    Site Map