Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version
Site Map

See information for:

The Verified Voting Foundation engages in educational activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(3). Please visit VerifiedVoting.org for info about 501(c)(4) lobbying activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  News  »  Related Voting Topics  »  Open Voter Purge List


Open Voter Purge List

story here
June 12th, 2004

Open Voter Purge List

Florida's flawed election of 2000 put a cloud over the presidency and made the state the laughing stock of the nation. One reason: A wildly inaccurate voter purge list that mistakenly identified 8,000 Floridians as felons thus ineligible to vote and that listed 2,300 felons, despite the fact that the state had restored their civil rights.

Approaching another election, the state has a new purge list, with more than 47,000 names. But officials are not worried about a recurrence of the 2000 embarrassment.

Why? Because legislators passed a law in 2001 keeping voter rolls, and the purge list, secret.

The law presumably protects the privacy of voters (although the lists are available to political parties and their candidates). But it will have the double "benefit" of making it difficult for the public to discover if thousands more Floridians are wrongly purged.

In a close election, a faulty purge list could be decisive.

A handful of news organizations, including CNN and Gannett Co., the First Amendment Foundation of Florida and U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., have filed suit seeking access to the voter rolls and purge list. In a state that prides itself on open government and public records, this law flies in the face of the "people's right to know." A judge in Tallahassee is not expected to rule for two weeks.

Although county supervisors of elections have vowed to be cautious and to check the purge lists for errors, it is no guarantee that some Floridians still will not be improperly disenfranchised.

Public scrutiny by the media and government watchdog groups would help ensure the integrity of the electorial process in Florida. Keeping the purge lists secret will only facilitate a cover-up.

Announcements

NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
Ruling Issued in Rutgers–Newark Law School’s Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines
Holt Statement on NJ Court Decision on Paper Ballots
Internet Voting, Still in Beta
MD: State elections head says new voting system costly, not effective
Coalition Supports Improvements for Troop Voting; Rejects Risky Internet Ballot Proposals
WV: The Internet is not a secure-enough platform for overseas voters
Maryland needs secure, verifiable voting system
TN: Voters need confidence in electoral process
Election Technology Leaders Launch "The Power To MOVE"
Patrick OKs expanded benefits for veterans
Plaintiffs Comment on Court Order regarding TN Voter Confidence Act
Security expert: no way to secure Internet voting
E-voting system lets voters verify their ballots are counted
Justice Department Probing Diebold Sale
In Industry First, Voting Machine Company to Publish Source Code
TN: State Division Of Elections Hosts Meeting On Optical Scan Voting
Verified Voting Statement on the Acquisition of Premier Election Solutions
Common Cause Tennessee Takes Legal Action to Protect Voters
Advocates warn of voting-machine 'monopoly'

Get E-Mail Alerts




Important Links

  • Election Workers: Take our 2008 Election Worker Survey
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project


  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    Verified Voting Foundation, Inc., is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, Verified Voting Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to Verified Voting Foundation, Inc.


    Privacy    Site Map