Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version

See information for:

The Verified Voting Foundation engages in educational activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(3). Please visit VerifiedVoting.org for info about 501(c)(4) lobbying activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation. Also, check out our blog and twitter feed.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  News  »  E-Voting News  »  New county vote scanners point to ...


New county vote scanners point to smoother election

story here
March 16th, 2004

New county vote scanners point to smoother election

BY MIKE FITZGERALD

Goodbye punch cards and hanging chads. Hello black felt tip pens and blank ovals.

This morning, St. Clair County voters will encounter for the first time the county's new optical scanning system. Instead of punching a ballot, voters will use a felt tip pen to fill in a circle next to the candidates or proposals ed. It's a process strikingly similar to what high school students do when they sit for their ACT and SAT tests.

The ballot is fed into a computer and the results are immediately recorded. This type of system is supposed to make tallying votes faster and more accurate, said Bob Delaney, the St. Clair County clerk.

"We're expecting the worst and hoping for the best," Delaney said. "I think we have done everything we could do, and my staff has done an excellent job. We know we'll have some problems, maybe in the morning, but the voters won't have a problem at all."

The East St. Louis Board of Election Commissioners rolled out a similar optical scanning system in 1997. But instead of improving the accuracy of voting, the new system led to a voter error rate that spiked elevenfold, from 1.17 percent in 1992 to a high of 13 percent in the March 2002 primary election the worst rate in Illinois, according to a University of Illinois research paper.

The difference between East St. Louis' optical scanning system and St. Clair County's?

The voting machines in St. Clair County are equipped with an error notification system. If a voter makes a mistake and votes for two candidates in the same race, the computerized tabulator "will kick the ballot back out and will not take it," Delaney said.

An election judge can then draw the voter aside, give him or her a new ballot and toss out the spoiled one, Delaney said.

In contrast, East St. Louis has no error notification system the reason why voters there suffer the highest error rate statewide, according to the University of Illinois researchers.

But that situation could change in the months ahead. East St. Louis election commissioners have agreed to apply for federal money to exchange the optical scanning gear for more state-of-the-art touch-screen computer machines when money for such an upgrade becomes available through the state.

The East St. Louis election board's agreement to apply for the money arose from its recent settlement of a federal voting rights lawsuit filed against it, as well as six other voting districts across the state, by the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois.

Still, these plans could all become moot before the year ends. City leaders are pushing ahead with plans to scrap the state's second-oldest election board and turn its duties over to the St. Clair County clerk's office. They hope to place the measure on the November ballot.

Faced with a ballooning budget deficit, City Manager Robert Storman sees no choice but to pull the plug on the board, which costs the city $434,000 a year to operate.

Several other Illinois towns operate their own election boards, but East St. Louis' is the only one in the metro-east.

"It's one of our top priorities," Storman said of plans to scuttle the board.

Closing down the election board is not "going to change the election process here in East St. Louis," Storman said. "It's going to change the finances, that's all."

James Lewis, the election board's executive director, said the board should continue to operate as it has done since its founding in 1886.

The election board has proved its value through voter education programs, said Lewis, who took over as executive director in 1978, following a series of election scandals.

Voting problems revealed in the aftermath of the November 2000 presidential election led the ACLU of Illinois to file a pair of lawsuits in U.S. District Court in Chicago against East St. Louis and the city of Chicago, as well as Cook, Sangamon, Will and Whiteside counties.

The two lawsuits were settled late last year and approved by U.S. District Judge Amy St. Eve, formerly of Belleville. The agreement calls for the defendants still using the old-fashioned punch-card ballots to replace them with better systems by the statewide primary election of March 2006. In addition, the State Board of Elections must seek money to buy the new systems.

The federal dollars will ultimately come from the federal government under legislation passed in 2002. Already the law has made a huge impact for St. Clair voters. The measure provided more than two-thirds of the $837,000 the county spent to buy optical scanning machines with error notification devices.

Announcements

August 26, 2010
On India’s Electronic Voting Controversy
August 25, 2010
Pac-Man for president: Hack highlights e-voting flaws
August 6, 2010
Voting Technology Research Gets In-Depth
July 27, 2010
State Election Officials: Recountable Process A Must for Overseas Voters
July 20, 2010
Online Voting: All That Glitters Is Not Gold (Unless You're a Vendor)
June 21, 2010
Voting Without A Net In South Carolina
June 17, 2010
Voting results in New Jersey should not be mysterious
June 16, 2010
Verified Voting Calls for Recountable, Auditable Voting Systems Following South Carolina Primary
June 16, 2010
Voting integrity groups call for investigation of South Carolina voting systems in wake of unexpected primary results in Democratic US Senate race
June 15, 2010
On the South Carolina Primary
May 23, 2010
Benefits, risks of e-mail ballots weighed
May 4, 2010
PA - Team 4: Security Concerns About Voting Machines Remain
April 26, 2010
California Assembly committee endorses UC Berkeley statistician's election auditing method
March 8, 2010
Feds Move to Break Voting-Machine Monopoly
March 2, 2010
Is the Internet the Right Place for Our Ballots? Election Administration and Voting Rights Thought Leaders Weigh in on the Future of Overseas Voting at Summit 2010
February 25, 2010
Minnesota Civic Groups Refute Recount Claims
February 17, 2010
Groups and Election Officials Warn Department of Justice that Voting Machine Vendor Merger will Inflate Costs to Taxpayers, Threaten Election Accuracy and National Security
February 11, 2010
Fla. justices uphold local election law
February 3, 2010
NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Ruling Issued in Rutgers–Newark Law School’s Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines

Get E-Mail Alerts




Important Links

  • VVBlog: Check out the latest news and commentary at our blog.
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project


  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    Verified Voting Foundation, Inc., is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, Verified Voting Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to Verified Voting Foundation, Inc.


    Privacy    Site Map