Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version

See information for:

The Verified Voting Foundation engages in educational activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(3). Please visit VerifiedVoting.org for info about 501(c)(4) lobbying activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation. Also, check out our blog and twitter feed.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  News  »  E-Voting News  »  Registrar says electronic vote ...


Registrar says electronic vote went smoothly

story here
March 4th, 2004

Registrar says electronic vote went smoothly

By MATTHIAS GAFNI, Times-Herald staff writer
A day after Tuesday's landmark election, initiating a new age of electronic voting, the Solano County Registrar of Voters Office called the process "one of the smoothest elections ever conducted in Solano County."

Registrar Laura Winslow offered glowing reviews of the new voting machines Wednesday, downplaying some minor glitches in Benicia. "It was overwhelmingly successful. We were successful beyond our expectations," she said.

Of 171,543 registered county voters, 71,129 (41.5 percent) voted Tuesday.

The county's turnout in last November's election was 28.2 percent; in the gubernatorial primary in 2002, it was 36.3 percent, and in the last presidential primary, in 2000, it was 50 percent.

"The voters spoke (Tuesday). The negativity didn't sway getting out to the polls to vote," Winslow said. "The continual negativity toward the equipment, if anything, brought more out to see what it was all about."

The "negativity" came from outspoken critics like Benician Doug MacDonald, who questioned the technology created by Diebold Election Systems Inc.

"The technology is not federally certified, it's not state certified, it's only conditionally certified and we've never had that before and it's unfortunate," MacDonald said.

The company has been criticized for the system's lack of security, questionable software and a political bias by its leader.

No matter how foolproof the software is, humans must operate the machines, which caused a couple minor problems Tuesday.

Two precincts were set up at the Club Pacifica of Benicia apartment complex clubhouse, 1300 Southampton Road.

At one point a circuit breaker blew because all the machines were plugged into one outlet, Winslow said. Back-up batteries operated for three hours until all the machines shut down, she said.

The poll workers called the Fairfield headquarters and were told to hand out provisional ballots until the circuit was reset and the machines were re-started, Winslow said. She added that no votes were lost because the memory cards are placed in a separate database.

"Unfortunately, when something happens, the media swarms all over it," Winslow said. "No matter what voting system you're changing to, there's a learning curve, so we expected a lot of calls, but we didn't get many calls."

Winslow's office set up a phone bank with seven lines, just in case, but she said the phones were mostly quiet.

Deborah Wojtala, of Benicia, the Club Pacifica apartment manager, voted there and prefers the new system.

"It made a lot more sense than punching a card," Wojtala said. "And it gives you a summary to see if you made a mistake and you could correct it. The old way you couldn't change it. With a punch card, once it's punched it's done."

Receipts were a hot topic among many voters interviewed, although Winslow said only a small percentage of voters mentioned receipts to her staff.

"I'm not hearing that," Winslow said. "It's something the Secretary of State has ordered us to implement by 2006. If it's the direction that the state wants to move by 2006, we will comply."

Volunteers surveys collected Tuesday by the registrar's office asking voters about the new machines will be studied and Winslow's office will return a report on the feedback.

Dana Dean, of Benicia, spent Tuesday with the poll observing committee of the Solano County Democratic Party Control and watched the official counting.

"In observing the election returns I got the sense they all knew what they were doing," Dean said.

"It's almost like a floppy disk and they have to carry it to other computers. Boxes of disks were taken here by car or by truck and I do have some security concerns with that," Dean said.

But, she said driving the disks was better than relying on e-mailing that could pose a security risk.

"It was an interesting experience. I, like others, still am very concerned with the potential security issues," she said. "It's a new system, and you always have problems with a new system.

"I think I'd go for a modified version where each individual person gets a paper receipt and introducing further security measures into the system," she said.

Dean heard reports that seniors who ed the large type screens had problems with the final screen displayed after votes were cast. Only half the summary screen initially appeared and many people didn't know to scroll down for all the results, Dean said.

The registrar's office prepared extensively for all possibilities, Winslow said. Poll workers trained for twice as long, the county administration office provided more than 100 volunteers and county supervisors canceled its weekly meeting to free up staff time.

Other minor problems still occurred that accompany any election, electronic or paper. A precinct opened late when poll workers at one church couldn't enter the building because the pastor had the keys. The workers handed out provisional ballots until the church was opened, Winslow said.

Benician Jan Radesky voted at Fire Station No. 2 with no problems and appreciated the new technology.

"It was very easy, very clear. I was in and out in less than 45 seconds," Radesky said. "I don't like computers, but I prefer computers in this way. Punch cards are archaic."

- E-mail Matthias Gafni at mgafni@thnewsnet.com or call 553-6825.

Announcements

August 26, 2010
On India’s Electronic Voting Controversy
August 25, 2010
Pac-Man for president: Hack highlights e-voting flaws
August 6, 2010
Voting Technology Research Gets In-Depth
July 27, 2010
State Election Officials: Recountable Process A Must for Overseas Voters
July 20, 2010
Online Voting: All That Glitters Is Not Gold (Unless You're a Vendor)
June 21, 2010
Voting Without A Net In South Carolina
June 17, 2010
Voting results in New Jersey should not be mysterious
June 16, 2010
Verified Voting Calls for Recountable, Auditable Voting Systems Following South Carolina Primary
June 16, 2010
Voting integrity groups call for investigation of South Carolina voting systems in wake of unexpected primary results in Democratic US Senate race
June 15, 2010
On the South Carolina Primary
May 23, 2010
Benefits, risks of e-mail ballots weighed
May 4, 2010
PA - Team 4: Security Concerns About Voting Machines Remain
April 26, 2010
California Assembly committee endorses UC Berkeley statistician's election auditing method
March 8, 2010
Feds Move to Break Voting-Machine Monopoly
March 2, 2010
Is the Internet the Right Place for Our Ballots? Election Administration and Voting Rights Thought Leaders Weigh in on the Future of Overseas Voting at Summit 2010
February 25, 2010
Minnesota Civic Groups Refute Recount Claims
February 17, 2010
Groups and Election Officials Warn Department of Justice that Voting Machine Vendor Merger will Inflate Costs to Taxpayers, Threaten Election Accuracy and National Security
February 11, 2010
Fla. justices uphold local election law
February 3, 2010
NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Ruling Issued in Rutgers–Newark Law School’s Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines

Get E-Mail Alerts




Important Links

  • VVBlog: Check out the latest news and commentary at our blog.
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project


  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    Verified Voting Foundation, Inc., is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, Verified Voting Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to Verified Voting Foundation, Inc.


    Privacy    Site Map